Given a sorted array of integers, find the starting and ending position of a given target value.
Your algorithm's runtime complexity must be in the order of O(log n).
If the target is not found in the array, return
[-1, -1]
.
For example,
Given
return
» Solve this problemGiven
[5, 7, 7, 8, 8, 10]
and target value 8,return
[3, 4]
.[解题思路]
首先二分,然后根据二分的坐标分别往前和往后找找即可。
[Code]
1: vector<int> searchRange(int A[], int n, int target) {
2: // Start typing your C/C++ solution below
3: // DO NOT write int main() function
4: vector<int> range;
5: int index = searchTarget(A, 0, n-1, target);
6: if(index == -1)
7: {
8: range.push_back(-1);
9: range.push_back(-1);
10: }
11: else
12: {
13: int is = index;
14: while(is>0 && A[is-1] == A[index]) is--;
15: int ie = index;
16: while(ie<n-1 && A[ie+1] == A[index]) ie++;
17: range.push_back(is);
18: range.push_back(ie);
19: }
20: return range;
21: }
22: int searchTarget(int A[], int start, int end, int target)
23: {
24: if(start > end) return -1;
25: int mid = (start+end)/2;
26: if(A[mid] == target) return mid;
27: if(A[mid]<target)
28: return searchTarget(A, mid+1, end, target);
29: else
30: return searchTarget(A, start, mid-1, target);
31: }
[Note]
1. Line 6
错误的写成,"if(index = -1)", 少了个=号,结果老是输出[-1,-1].
Update: 07/15/2013 Refactor the code
看了一下评论,Jarvis很关注最差时间复杂度。其实从题目上来说,它更关注是平均复杂度。上面的算法在最差情况下复杂度是O(n),但是平均复杂度是O(lgn)。
如果想实现最差复杂度也是O(lgn),也很简单,做两次二分就可以了,第一次二分找出最左边的边界,第二次二分找出最右边的边界,这样,无论平均还是最差都是O(lgn)。
实现如下:
1: vector<int> searchRange(int A[], int n, int target) {
2: vector<int> result;
3: result.push_back(-1);
4: result.push_back(-1);
5: // find the low bound of the range, O(lgn)
6: int start =0, end =n-1;
7: while(start < end)
8: {
9: int mid = (start + end)/2;
10: if(A[mid] < target)
11: {
12: start = mid + 1;
13: continue;
14: }
15: end = mid;
16: }
17: int low_bound = A[start] == target? start:-1;
18: if(low_bound == -1)
19: {
20: return result;
21: }
22: // find the high bound of the range, O(lgn)
23: start =low_bound, end =n;
24: while(start < end)
25: {
26: int mid = (start + end)/2;
27: if(A[mid] > target)
28: {
29: end = mid;
30: continue;
31: }
32: start = mid+1;
33: }
34: int high_bound = start-1;
35: result.clear();
36: result.push_back(low_bound);
37: result.push_back(high_bound);
38: return result;
39: }
1 comment:
the complexity is no longer O(lgn), right?
Post a Comment